after intervention with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "after intervention with" is not correct in standard written English.
It is typically used to describe a situation where an intervention has taken place, but the preposition "with" is not the appropriate choice in this context. Example: "The patient showed improvement after intervention."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

29 human-written examples

Improvement in written textual articulation after intervention with metacognitive strategies had been previously observed by Costa and Boruchovitch (2009) in a study with Brazilian children with typical development.

Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica

Bishop and Anderson (1990) found moderate improvement in undergraduate student understanding of natural selection after intervention with a unit on that subject designed to dispel misconceptions, while Demastes et al. (1995) found minimal improvement using the same instructional methods.

Evolution: Education and Outreach

Although the trial found that EPO was not associated with an increase in clinically significant serious adverse events, unfortunately, the trial found no significant renoprotection or amelioration of acute kidney injury after intervention with EPO.

Annals of Intensive Care

In the ticlopidine-only arm, suppression of platelet aggregation to the weakest stimuli (5 μmol/L ADP; 23% ± 7.5%) was detected within 24 hours after intervention, with maximal inhibition to both 5 and 20 μmol/L ADP observed 7 days after intervention (48% ± 7.9% and 18% ± 8.7%, respectively).

American Heart Journal

Moreover, in the current study leptin decreased after intervention with omega-3 PUFA.

Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy

An increase in adiponectin was noticed after intervention with various doses of omega-3 in obese subjects [ 20].

Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

31 human-written examples

The direction of the study is prospective (delayed-type cross-sectional study) with the purpose of observing the variation in the Hb values after a period of at least 4 weeks of a 'before-after' intervention with 80 mg of daily oral iron and to define the final diagnosis of the functional iron deficiency [ 36].

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth

The novel hypothetical device is assumed to minimize bleeding complications, especially after interventions with large sheaths, which makes same-day discharge safer than with existing VCDs.

BMC Health Services Research

This theoretical model resulted in a significant difference between some factors representing pain and sleep, but not in the cortisol concentrations after interventions with the TM method compared with the RTM method (control).

BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine

The rating ascribed to each paper that described studies with before-and-after interventions or with comparison groups represented a consensus between two reviewers while observational studies were rated by a single reviewer.

BMC Health Services Research

All but four contrasts showed both stepwise increases in compliance with hand hygiene associated with the intervention and increases in mean compliance in the period after intervention compared with that expected in the absence of the intervention.

British Medical Journal

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

For clearer and more grammatically sound writing, replace "after intervention with" with alternatives such as "following the intervention" or "post-intervention" to ensure accuracy and professionalism in your text.

Common error

Avoid using "with" after "intervention" when referring to a time frame. "With" typically indicates means or accompaniment, not temporal sequence. Instead, use "following," "after," or restructure the sentence for clarity.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "after intervention with" functions as a prepositional phrase indicating a time period that follows an intervention. Despite its usage, Ludwig AI indicates that the phrase is not considered standard English.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

Science

100%

Less common in

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "after intervention with" is commonly found in scientific literature to indicate a time period following a specific intervention. However, Ludwig AI suggests that this phrase is not considered grammatically correct in standard English. While its meaning is generally understood, it is recommended to opt for alternatives like "following the intervention" or "post-intervention" for clarity and grammatical accuracy. These alternatives ensure better readability and professionalism in your writing, avoiding potential misinterpretations and adhering to standard English usage.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

post-intervention

This alternative is a single word, adjective before the noun, that clearly indicates the period following an intervention.

following the intervention

This alternative uses a gerund phrase to indicate the time period directly after an intervention.

subsequent to the intervention

This alternative uses more formal language to denote the time period that follows an intervention.

after the procedure

This alternative replaces "intervention" with a more specific term, "procedure", if applicable.

in the wake of the intervention

This alternative is a more metaphorical expression indicating what immediately follows.

as a result of the intervention

This alternative focuses on the consequences or effects that follow the intervention.

upon completion of the intervention

This alternative stresses that the time frame begins when the intervention has finished.

after administering the intervention

This option emphasizes the action of giving or applying the intervention.

in the post-intervention phase

This alternative specifies a defined period or stage after the intervention.

once the intervention was performed

This alternative uses a more descriptive and explicit phrase structure.

FAQs

How can I rephrase "after intervention with" to improve clarity?

Consider using alternatives such as "following the intervention", "subsequent to the intervention", or the adjective "post-intervention" depending on the specific context.

Is "after intervention with" grammatically correct?

While commonly found, especially in scientific contexts, "after intervention with" is not considered standard English. It's generally better to opt for clearer alternatives such as "after the intervention" or "following the intervention".

What is the difference between "after intervention" and "after intervention with"?

"After intervention" is generally used to describe a time frame following an intervention. The addition of "with" is often unnecessary and grammatically questionable. It's more precise to use "after the intervention".

When is it appropriate to use the phrase "after intervention with"?

While some scientific literature may use "after intervention with", it's advisable to replace this phrase with clearer alternatives like "following the intervention" or "subsequent to the intervention" for enhanced readability and grammatical correctness.