Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
after exclusion
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "after exclusion" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where you want to indicate that something occurs following the act of excluding something or someone. Example: "The results were analyzed after exclusion of outliers to ensure accuracy."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
Alternative expressions(3)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
Twenty-three children were recruited after exclusion criteria.
After exclusion, results presented better indicators (Chachamovich et al., 2008).
After exclusion of patients not suitable for stenting, the final study group comprised 217 patients.
After exclusion of possible contaminating sequences, the remaining 34 were compared.
Sixty-eight data sets remained after exclusion of 4 patients who had undergone tape division.
After exclusion of 655 patients, 3970 were analyzed to identify risk factors for mediastinitis.
After exclusion of readmissions, 68 patients were entered into the Kaplan Meier analysis.
Science
Out of 396 qualifying records, 155 records entered the study group after exclusion criteria.
After exclusion of incomplete charts, 622 patient charts were available for analysis.
Only 13 patients with ISP were identified after exclusion of cases of children or neonates.
Science
After exclusion of the possibility of uterine perforation, the procedure was continued.
Science
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "after exclusion", clearly state the criteria for exclusion to avoid ambiguity. For example, instead of saying "After exclusion, the data was analyzed", specify "After exclusion of outliers, the data was analyzed."
Common error
Avoid vague statements like "After exclusion, results improved." Instead, specify what was excluded and why: "After exclusion of incomplete datasets, results showed a statistically significant improvement."
Source & Trust
83%
Authority and reliability
4.6/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "after exclusion" functions as a prepositional phrase, typically modifying a verb or noun. According to Ludwig, it serves to indicate the temporal sequence of events, specifically that an action or state follows the act of excluding something. It's commonly used to clarify the scope of analysis or results.
Frequent in
Science
100%
Less common in
News & Media
0%
Formal & Business
0%
Wiki
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "after exclusion" is a prepositional phrase commonly used in formal and scientific writing. As Ludwig AI confirms, it clarifies that an action or result occurs following the removal of certain elements. It's crucial for defining the scope of analysis and ensuring clarity, especially in research contexts. When using this phrase, specifying the exclusion criteria is essential to avoid ambiguity. While it may be replaced with alternatives like "following the removal of" or "excluding these items", the core meaning remains consistent. "After exclusion" helps create focused and precise statements, particularly in academic and professional documents.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
excluding these items
Directly states the act of keeping something out.
with the eliminated factors
Focuses on the factors that have been completely taken out of consideration.
following the removal of
Emphasizes the sequence of events, placing removal as a preceding action.
with the exceptions removed
Specifically refers to items that are exceptions to a rule or pattern.
subsequent to the omission of
More formal and highlights the act of leaving something out.
omitting these cases
Highlights the act of leaving out specific instances or examples.
once these are discounted
Focuses on disregarding specific items from consideration.
upon disregarding
Similar to 'once discounted', but with a slightly more active tone.
once ineligible entries are dropped
Applies specifically to cases where items do not meet certain criteria.
these having been disregarded
Passive construction emphasizing that something has already been ignored.
FAQs
How can I use "after exclusion" in a sentence?
Use "after exclusion" to indicate that a process or analysis occurred following the removal of certain elements. For example, "After exclusion of duplicates, 24 articles remained for review".
What are some alternatives to using "after exclusion"?
You can use alternatives such as "following the removal of", "subsequent to the omission of", or "excluding these items" depending on the context.
Is it necessary to specify what was excluded when using "after exclusion"?
Yes, it is best practice to specify what was excluded to ensure clarity and avoid ambiguity. For example, say "After exclusion of patients with pre-existing conditions" rather than just "after exclusion".
What's the difference between "after exclusion" and "before inclusion"?
"After exclusion" focuses on the removal of certain elements before a process, while "before inclusion" focuses on the criteria that must be met before something is added. They represent opposite sides of the same selection process. For example, you might use "after exclusion" when discussing data cleaning and "before inclusion" when outlining study enrollment criteria.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
83%
Authority and reliability
4.6/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested