Sentence examples for after consort from inspiring English sources

Also, a statistically significant improvement was observed for eight items after CONSORT was published and an improvement in seven items that did not reach statistical significance.

However, our results showed that abstract reporting improved significantly before CONSORT; on the other hand, recent reviews [47], [48] of abstract reporting in top impact-factor journals showed improvement also after CONSORT and also that many top journals had not been referring to CONSORT or alternative abstract guidelines, or had referred to old CONSORT versions.

We compared manuscripts published before CONSORT (2000-4) withoseose published after CONSORT (2005-8).

When considering the change from before to after CONSORT, the general medical journals showed significant improvement in only one criterion: reporting of number of clusters lost to follow-up (absolute improvement 17%, 3%to3131%).

Table 3 shows the percentage of trials that met each of the reporting criteria before and after CONSORT, together with the tests for trend and confidence intervals for absolute change in adherence.

In particular, assuming the most conservative estimate of adherence of 50% before CONSORT, improvements to 60%and70%0% adherence after CONSORT (2005-6 and 2007-8, respectively) would have been required to allow 80% probability of detecting a significant trend.

First we need to remember that Steinbrenner narrowly escaped going to prison after pleading guilty to illegal campaign contributions and that he could have been barred from baseball forever after consorting with a lowlife gambler to discredit Dave Winfield, one of his own players.

He became known as "Wally" after Wallis Simpson, consort of the abdicated Edward VIII and subsequent Duchess of Windsor.

Equality is the ideal, but an equality where the spiritual side of women (often known as the eternal feminine, but in India called "Shakti," after the consort of Shiva) fully blossoms.

Based on the summary score, trials published in higher impact factor journals reported a mean of 66.0% of criteria before and a mean of 68.3% of criteria after the CONSORT extension was published (absolute improvement 2.2%, −3.6% to 8.3%), while trials published in lower impact factor journals reported a mean of 54.4% before and 59.2% after (absolute improvement 4.8%, −1.4% to 11.0%).

Based on the summary score, trials conducted in clinical settings reported a mean of 63.3% of criteria before and a mean of 67.8% of criteria after the CONSORT extension was published (absolute improvement 4.6%, −1.1%too 10.3%), while trials published in non-clinical settings reported a mean of 55.3% before and 58.2% after (absolute improvement 2.9%, −3.7% to 9.4%).