Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(17)
After adjustment, a protective effect of statin initiation on AKI was observed (RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.63 to 0.96).
After adjustment, a current PTSD diagnosis (reference = no PTSD) was associated with an increased risk of GDM (RR 1.4, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.2, 1.7) and preeclampsia (RR 1.3, 95% CI 1.1, 1.6).
After adjustment, a 1 microgram per deciliter increase in average childhood blood lead level significantly predicts 0.06 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.01, 0.12) and 0.09 (95% CI = 0.03, 0.16) SD increases and a 0.37 (95% CI = 0.11, 0.64) point increase in adolescent impulsivity, anxiety or depression, and body mass index, respectively, following ordinary least squares regression.
RESULTS: After adjustment, a rhythm control strategy was found to be associated with increased early mortality (0-45 days: HR: 1.9, 95% CI 1.2 to 3.0, p=0.004) but not late mortality (45-1096 days: HR 1.1, 95% CI 0.9 to 1.4, p=0.45).
After adjustment, a Mallampati score higher than 2 (OR 37.8 [10.6–135.1]) and a limited mouth opening (OR 5.38, 95 % CI 1.1 26.4) were both associated with DI. Discussion In our study, the incidence of DI was comparable to previous studies.
After adjustment, a smaller overall effect was seen under the additive, dominant, and pairwise comparisons.
Similar(43)
After adjustment, an open SVG harvest approach was associated with an increased risk of secondary SSI (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 2.12; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.28-3.48).
After adjustment, an increase of 1 SD in TAC and CAC sum scores resulted in a 46%and41%1% increase in the risk of any CVD event.
After adjustment, an increase of 1 ppm in maternal hair mercury was associated with a decrement in VRM score of 7.5 (95% CI, –13.7 to –1.2) points.
After multivariate adjustment, A-FABP was an independent predictor of myocardial perfusion abnormalities and HF.
Having cardiovascular diseases was not associated with non-participation after adjustments, a finding which is supported by other studies [ 11, 43] but not all [ 13].
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com