The phrase "after a statistical analysis" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when referring to actions or conclusions that follow the completion of a statistical analysis.
Example: "The results were surprising after a statistical analysis revealed significant trends in the data."
Alternatives: "following a statistical analysis" or "subsequent to a statistical analysis".
Ultimately, after a statistical analysis of the collected data, they found that use of the honey-hunting sound more than tripled the probability of finding a bees' nest.
After a statistical analysis of the first results, the Principal Component Analysis (PCA) method was applied to remove redundant objectives, thus leading to only four contradictory objectives.
Finally, after a statistical analysis of the data, a regression rate expression as a function of the design parameters is obtained.
After a statistical analysis, concentrations of Sn, Zn, Hg, Cu and Cr (among all physico-chemical analyzed parameters), in order of importance, were the most important factors that divided the two groups of samples (more and less toxic samples).
After a statistical analysis on 837 deep oil gas reservoirs in the USA, Dyman et al. (1997) discovered that structural traps and combination traps make up as much as 66.9%%.
After a statistical analysis of the insects' body measurements and colors, as well as their abundance and ability to trick both humans and birds, the authors discarded most of the existing explanations.
Preoperative and 3-month postoperative lesion volumes were measured on CBCT images, and the osteogenesis index was calculated in each case, after which, a statistical analysis was performed.
After applying a statistical analysis to identify differentially expressed genes in each experiment, we obtained a total of 25,000 gene signatures (a typical study produces multiple results).
After the field works, a statistical analysis was carried out for frequency distribution and cross-tabulation, backed up by chi-squared testing.
Another of the lab's papers was found, after publication, "to have a statistical analysis mistake that decreased the main significance of the work a lot".
It came after Daily Kos published a statistical analysis of Research 2000's polls that alleged a series of statistical anomalies among the results.
