The phrase "aforementioned arguments" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring back to arguments that have already been mentioned earlier in the text.
Example: "In conclusion, the aforementioned arguments clearly demonstrate the need for policy reform."
Alternatives: "previously mentioned arguments" or "earlier stated arguments".
Considering the aforementioned arguments and research, the current study sets the following objectives: (1) Perform a latent profile analysis to classify Korean children's behavioral problems.
For question (2), based on the aforementioned arguments and big assumption (i.e. they all share the same functional form of Wmean), we can thus predict the packet loss rates for 802.11, 802.11e and 802.11aa, all based on Eq. (6).
According to the aforementioned arguments, we here derive the solution of combined pulsatile pressure-driven and electroosmotic flow through an elliptic cylindrical microchannel under the Navier slip condition to describe the flow behavior in a more realistic situation than the previous works.
For instance, the aforementioned arguments around Llat/Lrand can be readily inverted, i.e. the 'bias via random networks' would be replaced by a 'bias via lattices' Lrand/Llat and the challenge regarding its N,k-dependence would persist.
Based on the aforementioned arguments, these primary polymers could be related to modern RNA.
Conversely, the aforementioned arguments strongly suggest the importance to focus on appendix microbiota as a novel actor capable to modulate host metabolism via shaping appendix immune function.
Nevertheless, here we present current evidence showing that the aforementioned argument is rather inconsistent and unwarranted on evolutionary grounds.
Finally, Table 8 presents the post-sample predictive tests that validate the aforementioned argument.
Accordingly, consistent with the aforementioned argument of Park (2014) and Horwitz's (2016) comments, the purpose of the present study was to first seek understanding of the components of the FLCAS in a higher educational context in Japan.
But based on the aforementioned argument against voting for Bernie Sanders, many people believe we shouldn't elect him to be our next president because... his policies might be blocked by other elected officials?... officials elected to represent the best interests of the American people?... at a time when many of Bernie Sanders' proposals are supported by the majority of Americans?
Summers, completely wrong on his aforementioned argument, was certainly right about something else he said to the angry twins during their heated conversation, "So find another idea!" he says, "Today, students at Harvard University believe that creating a job is better than finding a job".
