The phrase 'affluent for' is not correct and cannot be used in written English.
Affluent is an adjective, so if you wish to use it in a sentence, it would need to be modified. An example sentence might be: "The family was affluent, making it easier for them to pay for college tuition."
This aimed to slightly raise sales taxes for four years and income taxes on the affluent for a period of five years.
And delaying child-bearing is better suited to the more affluent, for whom it yields economic benefits, in the form of educational opportunities and career advancement.
Through his investment company, Berkshire Hathaway, he bought the private jet travel business, which caters to the affluent, for $725 million in 1998.
Members of the Bush team drew up the tax cuts essentially as a rebate to the affluent for the excess money they said Washington had been taking.
But his father was not the man to stay affluent for long; he drank, neglected his affairs, and borrowed money from his office, and his family sank deeper and deeper into poverty, the children becoming accustomed to conditions of increasing sordidness.
Swach services 400,000 households in the city – from slums to the more affluent – for a user fee ranging from 10-30 rUS$0.15-US$0.15-US$0.50 per household per month – the fee is fixed at 15 rupees (US$0.25) for slum dwellers.
Tax cuts for the affluent paid for by program cuts for the needy will be on the table.
Adaptation will probably be easier for the affluent than for the poor.
Imagine if NHS hospitals and surgeries had been set up with two entrances: one for the affluent, one for the poor.
Back then the affluent fell for partnerships promising outsized writeoffs for cattle breeding, oil wells and the like.
Internships that pay the minimum wage are still much more feasible for affluent students than for students paying their own way through college.
