The phrase "affirms explicitly" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when you want to indicate that something is stated clearly and directly without any ambiguity.
Example: "The report affirms explicitly the company's commitment to sustainability and environmental responsibility."
Alternatives: "states clearly" or "confirms directly".
South Africa also boasts a post-apartheid constitution that explicitly affirms equality and non-discrimination on the basis of sexuality and gender.
Flunder is one of the founders of City of Refuge, in San Francisco, which is part of the United Church of Christ, and which explicitly affirms same-sex relationships, and, more recently, of the Fellowship, a nationwide network of like-minded congregations.
Berkeley explicitly affirms that spirits are substances in the Principles and Dialogues.
In distinguishing between a civilized society where individuals do not humiliate each other and a decent society where at least the institutions do not do so, Avishai Margalit (1996, 1 2) explicitly affirms this point.
For [St. Thomas] explicitly affirms, that not all and always are men moved by grace, but only 'specialiter, & interdum, & aliquos.'" 32.. See especially letters to Vuillaret (21 juin 1692, OA, 3 497 98) and to Bossuet (juillet 1694, OA, 3 661 65).
In 2004, for example, William Dembski, a leading ID proponent, wrote, "In the current intellectual climate it is impossible to get a paper published in the peer-reviewed biological literature that explicitly affirms intelligent design or explicitly denies Darwinian and other forms of naturalistic evolution.
It is notable that David Lewis, who revived Russell's theory in 1989 (without realizing it was Russell's), explicitly affirms what Moore implicitly denies that there can be unobvious analytic truths; that is, truths not evident to every competent speaker (see Lewis 1989 and Pigden 2007).
Hausmann says the film "explicitly affirms the importance of upholding the prohibition against incest"; a recurring theme of Ball's work is his comparison of the taboos against incest and homosexuality.
We note that a possible difference between responding to our religious and nonreligious stimuli is that, for both groups, a person's answers could serve to affirm his or her identity: i.e. for every religious trial, Christians were explicitly affirming their religious worldview, while nonbelievers were explicitly denying the truth-claims of religion.
But the ruling also explicitly affirmed Congress's power to enact laws that bear on marital rights and privileges.
