The phrase "affirmative items" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where you are referring to items or points that are positive or confirmatory in nature, such as in discussions, reports, or evaluations.
Example: "The committee reviewed the proposal and highlighted several affirmative items that support its implementation."
Alternatives: "positive elements" or "confirmatory points".
Affirmative items are summed up to scale scores.
Food security was scored using Bickel and colleagues' guidelines [ 37], in which affirmative items are scored with "1".
There were 134 (25%) of subjects who were classified as food insecure, based on a definition of two affirmative items out of six.
A total score on the EAP checklist is calculated by counting the affirmative items ('yes' = key feature is present), yielding a score between 0 and 15 points.
Each additional affirmative item a student answers on the violence index was associated with a 1.74 times greater likelihood of being a gun carrier (CI 1.70-1.78).
My, how you've changed Go east, young Mormon The pledge Red George Reprints Related items Affirmative action: The wrong decision, poorly madeJun 26th 2003 Affirmative action: Anyone for a bit of legal fudge?Jun 26th 2003 The Supreme Court: First among equalsMay 15th 2003In the final week of the court's term, it delivered two bombshells for conservatives.
Plugged The roof that costs too much Beware the K-Street conservatives Reprints Related items Affirmative action in America: Orwell and beyondDec 5th 2002 Campaign finance: The tempting of John KerryMar 5th 1998Mr Kerry's strongest card as a presidential candidate is the fact that he is a much-decorated veteran of the Vietnam war.
Though all of America's top universities deny having a racial quota, this is what their policies amount to in all but name.In this section At the gates of Baghdad End it, don't mend it Coughs and sneezes Bringing down Mugabe Breaking convention Reprints Related items Affirmative action: It is so orderedApr 3rd 2003Affirmative action's original rationale was to redress past racial wrongs.
In the one-parameter logistic model, the probability of a subject, s, giving an affirmative response to item i is estimated from the difference between the item calibration or relative severity of the item, β i, and the trait level or severity of experienced food insecurity of the subject, θs.
To analyze the test, four subtests were constructed by categorizing the 64 dichotomous items as "Affirmative Active," "Affirmative Passive," "Negative Active," and "Negative Passive".
Taking into consideration both measures, at least 51.1% of participants answered in the affirmative to each item.
