The phrase "affective force" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts discussing emotions, feelings, or psychological impacts, particularly in fields like psychology, literature, or philosophy.
Example: "The affective force of the poem resonated deeply with its readers, evoking a strong emotional response."
Alternatives: "emotional impact" or "emotional power".
The cerebral table distinguishes ten affective forces, five intellectual functions, and three practical qualities; these correspond to the heart, mind, and character, respectively.
The first part of this "systematic verse" is guaranteed by the dominance of the heart; but, among the ten "affective forces", the first seven correspond to egoism, the final three to altruism.
And the affective power is enormous.
It requires a fundamental and sustained politics of restoration that unleashes all the possible economic, practical and affective centrifugal forces to counter the corrosive effects of the disintegrative politics that has prevailed for so long.
Due to the complexity of food decision making, consumers are susceptible to a wide range of social, cognitive, affective, and environmental forces determined to interrupt their intentions to restrict their dietary intake.
His work schedule during the holidays would certainly make Andy more vulnerable than most to seasonal affective disorder, but the force behind his eyes is harder than depression, closer to rage.
His work examines how English playwrights from William Shakespeare to John Milton helped to develop the concept of representation: the idea that the words and actions of one person, group, or thing could stand in for those of another with affective, social, legal, and political force.
"Equally adept at using her lipstick as a cunning tool or fighting off goblin soldiers, Sarah was adept and affective, neither hyper-feminine nor forced into a masculinised version of heroism.
On the second, she is seen as driven by unconscious, affective and automatic – largely biologised – forces that determine her behaviour and actions against her will or rational intentions (Thaler and Sunstein, 2008; Rice, 2013).
Yet, as valuable as rational analysis and free choice undoubtedly are, feminists argue that these capacities do not operate apart from affective, biosocial, socio-economic and other heterogeneous forces that orchestrate the multilayered phenomenon that we call the self.
