The phrase "affected observations" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where you are discussing observations that have been influenced or altered by certain factors or conditions.
Example: "The study revealed that the affected observations significantly skewed the overall results, leading to inaccurate conclusions."
Alternatives: "influenced observations" or "altered observations".
Studies on pedigrees, indicate large differences in incidence between breeding lines and an increased risk in relatives of affected dogs (unpublished observation) supporting a high heritability for the diseases.
Although immunoreactivity was not detected in the optic nerve of the current affected sheep, our observation that the histological changes were the most severe in the central and paracentral areas of the retina is in agreement with the hypothesis of neural spread.
Moreover, asking nonaffected people about their observations of affected people may favour mentioning phenomena that are easily observable rather than internal cognitive or emotional states, which are less easily observed by outsiders.
Since the initial observations of affected house finches in the mid-Atlantic region, the disease has become widespread and has been reported throughout the eastern United States and Canada.
Despite of the detected akinesia in the echocardiograms there were neither increased echogenicity of the affected area, nor histological observations of increased fibrosis referring to myocardial infarction scar in Masson-Trichrome stained serial sections (data not shown).
Although the obvious clinical changes are well described in BRAO, including swelling and opacification of the affected area, such ophthalmoscopic observations remain unspecific and do not allow any understanding of the pathophysiological effects of severe ischaemia in a complete neurosensory structure.
This circumstance should not be expected to change when using other disease models than the liability, since the loss of rgĝ arises from the loss of quantitative information when moving from a continuous genetic value (however defined) to the categorical observation of affected or not.
However, this seems less likely, as extensive genotyping investigations have failed to identify viable CVM affected cases (Bendixen, personal observation).
A717 is clearly showing the poorest convergence, which is very little affected by the different observation and noise scenarios.
