The phrase "affect the fairness of" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when discussing how a particular action, decision, or factor may influence the impartiality or equity of a situation.
Example: "The new policy changes could significantly affect the fairness of the hiring process."
Alternatives: "impact the equity of" or "influence the impartiality of".
"The cutbacks affect the fairness of proceedings for indigent defendants," Mr. Berko said.
I'd like to think that it doesn't affect the fairness of my coverage, but I'm sure that you'll let me know what you think once you've finished reading.
Care should be taken when reporting matters relating to Mr Mahmood to ensure it does not affect the fairness of future proceedings as a police investigation in remains ongoing".
Judge Matsch rejected the argument on Wednesday, saying the new documents would have done nothing to affect the fairness of Mr. McVeigh's trial or the jury's sentence of death.
The Circuit Court of Appeals, affirming the judgment, 73 F.(2d) 278, held that there was a variance between the allegations of the conspiracy count and the proof, but that it was not prejudicial; and that the conduct of the prosecuting attorney, although to be condemned, was not sufficiently grave to affect the fairness of the trial.
However, seven members of the chamber at the court ruled on Wednesday it did not affect the fairness of trial.
However, as used by these courts, error which "affected the substantial rights of the parties" was generally understood to refer, not to errors respecting a particular class of rights, but rather to any error which affected the fairness of the trial as a whole by calling into question the reliability of the result.
Advertising to increase off-peak usage would have to increase peak usage, while other factors that directly affect the fairness and efficiency of appellant's rates remained constant.
391, 392, 80 L.Ed. 555 (1936) ("In exceptional circumstances, especially in criminal cases, appellate courts, in the public interest, may, of their own motion, notice errors to which no exception has been taken, if the errors are obvious, or if they otherwise seriously affect the fairness, integrity or public reputation of judicial proceedings").
The role of the plain-error doctrine has always been to empower courts, especially in criminal cases, to correct errors that seriously affect the "fairness, integrity or public reputation of judicial proceedings". United States v. Atkinson, 297 U.S. 157, 160, 56 S.Ct.
This means that neither the frequency reuse strategy nor the scheduling algorithm affects the fairness in bandwidth sharing of best effort flows.
