The phrase "affect the collaboration" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing how certain factors or actions may influence or change the nature of a collaborative effort.
Example: "The recent changes in management could significantly affect the collaboration between the teams."
Alternatives: "influence the collaboration" or "impact the collaboration".
The main objective of this paper is to identify the factors that affect the collaboration among the participants in the building design process.
The reasons and ways through which these procedures develop and may affect the collaboration to a greater or lesser extent has not been systematically investigated.
Several factors affect the collaboration and participation of subjects, such as population characteristics, cultural attitudes, way of initial contact, length of time needed for full participation, follow-up procedure, legitimacy of the research from the subject's viewpoint, and subject's interest by the research topic[ 7- 9].
The implications of this finding need to be investigated in order to determine how this affects the collaboration between health care professionals.
Questions addressed the respondents' motivation for participation in the partnership, the process for establishing priorities and selecting projects, barriers and facilitators that affected the collaboration, the benefits of the partnership, the limits of what such partnerships can achieve, and recommendations.
As collaborations in stem cell science involve scientists with different disciplinary skill sets, it would be interesting to know if any particular disciplinary group tends to be placed in a subordinate or 'service-provision' (Calvert 2010) role more often in industrially-focused collaborations, and if so how this would affect the value of collaboration to this group of scientists?
We specifically examined if international collaborations increase citation rates, and if differing research regulations and legislations affect the frequency of collaboration.
This paper aims to address the following research questions: How does engineering changes and error handling affect the degree of collaboration and decision making within and across enterprises and how CoPDISS helps to overcome this?
Qualitative analysis of comments made by Sociology and Civil Engineering academics shows how entrenched beliefs and perceptions may adversely affect the potential for collaboration, and prevent the inclusion of information literacy in undergraduate curricula.
Potential partners abound in such networks but clusters and gaps in the organisation of the network can affect the likelihood of collaboration [ 29, 30].
Empirical support comes from a study that examined the extent to which internal collaboration scripts affect the quality of collaborative argumentation in a CSCL inquiry unit (Kollar et al., 2007).
