Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
"aesthetically poor" is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
It can be used to describe something that lacks visual beauty or appeal. It is often used to critique an object, design, or artwork. For example: - The painting was aesthetically poor, with sloppy brushstrokes and dull colors. - The website's design was aesthetically poor, making it difficult to navigate. - The building's exterior was aesthetically poor, with mismatched materials and an unappealing design.
Exact(1)
Apart from this aesthetically poor, persistent lumpy appearance, no other gross abnormalities were identified.
Similar(55)
Tekin's style is very poetic and presents the world of the poor as something aesthetically fascinating, rather than as some horrid space one should escape from as soon as possible.
As the public becomes more discerning about design and more concerned with the impact of the products they consume, sustainable design has shed its reputation of being poor-quality, or aesthetically inferior to high-end design items.
The alliances that formed were part supper club and part hothouse -- hardly a movable feast, since everybody was so poor -- but intellectually rich and aesthetically provocative.
To others the change represents a threat to spiritual integrity - gentrification that will drive out the poor and destroy all that has made Harlem aesthetically distinctive.
To top it off, she had the poor taste to get older, changing from an aesthetically appealing child into an angular-faced woman with a decidedly mature body and all its discomforting, musky appetites.
Latife Tekin had produced an aesthetically daring fictional world based on the lives of the poor in her Berji Kristin: Tales from the Garbage Hills, which has an excellent English edition published by Marion Boyars.
There is little aesthetically inspired about the film; in fact, it feels like a poor adaptation of a beloved book, but the only victim of the film's flatness is Goldberger's own innovation.
(Poor Prince Andrei and his forever opening-and-closing Austerlitz wound!) Narratively, directorially and aesthetically everything is still on top form.
A poor layout of a graph may confuse the user, whereas a well-organized and aesthetically pleasing layout can improve the user's ability to understand the underlying data.
Aesthetically appealing?
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com