The phrase "aesthetically correct" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing whether something meets certain standards of beauty or design.
Example: "The sculpture was not only functional but also aesthetically correct, pleasing to the eye and harmonious with its surroundings."
Alternatives: "visually appealing" or "aesthetically pleasing".
Hootenanny-style presentations have always been useful, for Grammy telecasts, but now they're aesthetically correct, too.
He and his brother don't fit into their "New Yorkish or Berlin-style conceptual" vision of what is aesthetically correct.
Even those of us who habitually favor serious, austere, aesthetically correct drinks — single-malt Scotch, green tea, pomegranate juice, whatever — may occasionally indulge in a frivolous cocktail bedecked with fruit and umbrellas and served in a bulbous, sugar-rimmed glass.
(Or is the more aesthetically correct term graphic-novel-inspired comedy?) Mr. Askins, author of the appealing, offbeat "Hand to God," about a boy and his foul-mouthed puppet, has concocted an elaborate and strenuously quirky tale of a would-be action hero on a quest to save the world.
Yes, outlets like The Guardian, The Independent and Buzzfeed are aesthetically correct in comparing the Al Wakrah World Cup Stadium design to a vagina.
According to Ringer, Striggio's original ending was almost certainly used at the opera's premiere, but there is no doubt that Monteverdi believed the revised ending was aesthetically correct.
In the 20th century, however, a historically and aesthetically more correct opinion has been formed, largely through studies by Max Schneider and Romain Rolland.
We're constantly asking our questions about what is aesthetically and ethically correct".
Implantation of spring-like distractors in the treatment of sagittal craniosynostosis is a novel technique that has proven functionally and aesthetically effective in correcting skull deformities; however, final shape outcomes remain moderately unpredictable due to an incomplete understanding of the skull-distractor interaction.
We don't all agree on what is aesthetically appropriate or architecturally correct, but I won't force my taste on someone else".
But as natural items are not human creations they can give us no basis for deciding between equally correct but aesthetically contrasting categorizations.
