"adverse media coverage" is an acceptable phrase in written English.
It can generally be used to describe the overall negative portrayal of a person or organization in the news or media. For example, "After the scandal broke, the company had to deal with adverse media coverage in the newspapers and on TV."
He said it was unhelpful to "demonise" the system with "adverse media coverage".
That triggered widespread public revulsion and adverse media coverage, forcing Murdoch to close the News of the World.
The Association of Chief Police Officers (ACPO) believes that "ill-informed, adverse media coverage has contributed to heightened local tensions and resentment of asylum seekers".
So worried are they about the possible scale of parliamentary opposition, adverse media coverage and a public backlash, that the term "ID card" has been removed from the New Labour lexicon.
Her lawyers said: "As we are sure that you will readily understand, being subject to a police investigation is highly distressing for any person, but especially so for a teenager, particularly one who has been recently subject to such adverse media coverage.
However, some leading global brands including those which have previously received adverse media coverage such as Nike, Coca-Cola and Primark, already have strong corporate social responsibility and ethical trading policies that include steps taken to avoid forced labour in their supply chains.
Unsurprisingly these decisions triggered local opposition and adverse national media coverage.
A retrospective cohort design was used to determine whether media coverage of adverse events that occurred in Veterans Health Administration VHAA) hospitals was associated with subsequent veteran disenrollment.
The effects of television media coverage on adverse event reporting appear strongest for earlier reports.
– Government official 2 Interviews with policy stakeholders revealed that the government initiated periodic attempts to formalize government restrictions on dual practice, motivated by suspicion around dual practice due to media coverage of adverse health outcomes and poor public sector performance.
Also, if equal coverage of both frightening and reassuring information are presented in the media at a similar time, individuals will take longer to trust the reassuring information [44], and thus the introduction of high levels of media coverage of possible adverse events should be carefully considered.
