The phrase "adverse implication for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing negative consequences or effects that may arise from a particular situation or decision.
Example: "The new policy may have an adverse implication for employee morale and productivity."
Alternatives: "negative consequence for" or "detrimental effect on".
Many of these would be under threat, with adverse implications for some of the 30,000 employees currently employed by Argos.
Speaking on Wednesday, the Bank of England's chief economist, Andy Haldane, warned that high executive remuneration could have adverse implications for shareholders.
It will include ministerial powers to veto NAIF funding "if the minister considers the project to have adverse implications for Australia".
Upcoming local government budget cuts of 10% for 2015-16 are "likely to have further adverse implications for biodiversity conservation", warns the London Wildlife Trust, which says there has already been a "substantial impact" from previous cuts this parliament.
The federal court had ruled that Tony Burke, the previous environment minister, had erred by failing to properly consult departmental advice relating to the mine's adverse implications for the Tasmanian devil.
Judge Judith W. Rogers, concurring with the court's decision, said eliminating the rule "would have serious adverse implications for public health and the environment," because "the rule has become so intertwined" with the overall architecture of current Clean Air Act protections.
"I think that exchange rates should reflect economic fundamentals, that excess volatility and disorderly movements in exchange rates have adverse implications for economic and financial stability," he said.
We are agreed that excessive volatility and disorderly movements in exchange rates can have adverse implications for economic and financial stability.
"As we have long stated, excess volatility and disorderly movements in exchange rates have adverse implications for economic and financial stability," the group said in a joint statement.
It stated that their policy was not "to target our exchange rates for competitive purposes" and that "excess volatility of financial flows and disorderly movements in exchange rates have adverse implications for economic and financial stability".
