The phrase "adversarial judicial" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts discussing legal systems, particularly those that involve opposing parties in a court setting.
Example: "The adversarial judicial system is designed to ensure that both sides have an equal opportunity to present their case."
Alternatives: "adversarial legal" or "opposing judicial".
Within an adversarial judicial system, how can lawyers conduct negotiations that don't just carve up the pie but enlarge it?
More foreign investment to boost Mexico's flagging energy output; cuts in over-generous public pensions; a more efficient, "adversarial" judicial system modelled on America's; and of course, better education.This is a contest not of ideas, then, but of personalities and party machines.
(D) Objection: Even though each side in our adversarial judicial system strives to forward its own interests rather than aiming at justice, the structural features of the system make it a reasonably good procedure for achieving justice.
The adversarial judicial process that otherwise fuels our legal system, prosecutors and defense attorneys, rules to compel disclosure, cross examination and so forth would not exist as new FISA-only "advocate" rules are created in a pseudo-parallel system.
In France's non-adversarial judicial system the measure of insanity was not linked to the (English) M'Naghten rule, which demanded whether at the time of the crime the defendant understood right from wrong.
The Supreme Court's opinion turned on complex questions of federal law governing the circumstances in which federal courts can grant relief to prisoners convicted in state court, but one significant consequence is that prosecutorial decision-making was further immunized from adversarial testing and judicial scrutiny.
The proposals include a call for strong judicial oversight and an adversarial process for surveillance requests, including at the secretive Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court.
It also intended to turn the PGR into an independent prosecution service and to reform the judicial system, moving to adversarial oral trials in place of the current inquisitorial approach using written evidence.
Now, don't get me wrong, I fully understand and respect that our judicial system is an adversarial one.
The U.S. judicial system is an adversarial one, experts interviewed repeatedly said, and one that obligates a defense attorney to zealously defend their client.
The judicial system is non-adversarial and it is relatively difficult for citizens to file complaints against police.
