The phrase "adversarial countries" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe nations that are in conflict or opposition to each other, often in a political or military context.
Example: "The negotiations were complicated by the presence of adversarial countries at the summit."
Alternatives: "hostile nations" or "opposing countries".
Connect to Today: In the June 2008 New York Times Backgrounder"Negotiating with Hostile States," Robert McMahon discussed the recent history of U.S. policy on engaging with adversarial countries like Iran, and stateless parties like Hezbollah.
His indirect criticisms of the United States and Israel, they said, were no surprise, and in any event, they said, Mr. Obama did not view meeting the heads of even adversarial countries as a concession.
"I hope that Twitter will reconsider its policies, when it's dealing with friendly intelligence services in countries like the United States and the U.K., as opposed to adversarial countries like Russia and China," Cotton replied.
The experiences in more adversarial countries such as the UK, France, and Germany are less encouraging as the results of deliberations are not widely published in the media decision-makers are not willing to submedia decision-makerso smare groups of laypeople, anotadministrators have paid only lip service to the conference statements (Renn 2008, p. 341).
Trump's tax returns could also offer answers to questions about his business dealings abroad ― especially in adversarial countries like Russia.
"And I think there should be an investigation because in order to defend ourselves against other adversarial countries, we have to protect our information".
There are many more populations of non-adversarial countries which have been subjected to the same type of mass surveillance net by the NSA: indeed, the list of those which haven't been are shorter than those which have.
"There are many more populations of non-adversarial countries which have been subjected to the same type of mass surveillance net by the NSA," Greenwald wrote Sunday on the Guardian website.
With access to these primary sources, Leong is able to upend several scholarly assumptions and beliefs and present a never-before-seen picture of Japanese American struggles-both with an adversarial host country and among themselves-backed by the authority of primary sources.
"With a single phone call, the commander in chief has virtually unlimited power to rain down nuclear weapons on any adversarial regime and country at any time..
The commander in chief has "virtually unlimited power to rain down nuclear weapons on any adversarial regime and country at any time," which could extinguish "hundreds of millions of lives" in just a few hours, he wrote.
