The phrase "advantages something" is not correct in English and does not convey a clear meaning.
It seems to be an incomplete thought and lacks context to determine its intended use.
Example: "The advantages of this approach are numerous."
Alternatives: "benefits of" or "pros of".
The Dell board must be praised for trying to prevent Mr. Dell from using his position to gain an unfair advantage, something Mr. Dell amenably went along with.
The main benefit will be if it can tie up a single commodity and move the price to their advantage, something Xstrata was unable to do.
The lesson that Butera and others on his management team drew was that the Atlantic City casinos had negotiated away too much of their house advantage, something they said was common at Foxwoods under previous management teams.
One advantage, something most regular travelers are likely to appreciate, is that with their app users can browse through their stitched-together guides offline, forgoing hefty roaming fees.
Cost-effectiveness is favorable when there is an OS advantage, something that has only been seen in the ECOG 1684 trial described and not so in the others as reviewed here.
The variable "advantageous inequality in Nash" is significantly negative in Table 5, indicating that players expect their opponents to be less often consistent even when the Nash-equilibrium would be to their (i.e., the opponent's) advantage – something which players themselves do not consider as far as their own consistency is concerned (see Table 4).
The pamphlets illustrate the advantages of something known as "the living trust," which despite its theological overtones soon proves to be a matter of hard dollars & cents.
And in both cases the loss of effective boundaries, though it brings some direct advantages, threatens something important: the ability of creators to profit from their creations, the ability of governments to collect revenue.
While I accept that, in cricket, it's never clear to the next batsman when he might be in, it seems odd to me – in this era of intense preparation and professionalism and the quest for marginal advantages – that something equivalent never happens.
If Krugman is right, and we all have a comparative advantage in something, then combined we all have a comparative advantage in everything.
