The phrase "advantaged individual" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe a person who has certain benefits or privileges compared to others, often in discussions about social or economic inequality.
Example: "In discussions about educational access, it's important to consider the experiences of the advantaged individual versus those who face systemic barriers."
Alternatives: "privileged individual" or "fortunate individual".
This is in line with Hines et al. (2001), who found no significant effect of the unemployment rate on the most advantaged individuals (in their case, college graduates).
Because transnational feminist solidarity is based on shared political commitments rather than a common identity or set of experiences, advantaged individuals, including those who have benefited from injustice, can join in solidarity with those who have experienced injustice or oppression directly (Ferguson 2009, Scholz 2008).
Compared with the more advantaged, individuals of low socio-economic status are believed to experience greater and more severe daily stressors.
In bivariate analyses, minorities, less educationally or economically advantaged individuals and the uninsured had greater general concerns about underuse.
It is also plausible that socially advantaged individuals may cope with end-stage disease and related pain for a longer time period than more socially disadvantaged individuals.
Consistent evidence has shown that socioeconomically advantaged individuals, whether expressed in terms of education, income, or occupation, tend to have better health than disadvantaged individuals (1).
Elevations in economically advantaged individuals may be due to consumption of more expensive fish, such as swordfish, which tend to be higher in mercury (Hightower and Moore 2003).
The use of an aggregate SES index assumes that relatively disadvantaged individuals do not reside in areas of upper SES, and vice versa for relatively advantaged individuals in areas of lower SES.
Thus, despite having access to surgery through the public healthcare system, socially disadvantaged individuals may be less likely to utilise this option for end-stage disease compared to more advantaged individuals.
General theories on the diffusion of innovations suggest that, because more advantaged individuals are often early adopters, innovations that improve health may exacerbate socio-economic inequalities in health (Rogers 2003).
