The phrase "advanced thinkers" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe individuals or groups who engage in complex, innovative, or critical thinking processes.
Example: "In today's rapidly changing world, advanced thinkers are essential for developing solutions to global challenges."
Alternatives: "progressive minds" or "innovative thinkers".
The money was stuffed into the mail box by one of the plain, ordinary advanced thinkers with which the city swarms.
But I would say especially PayPal and the PayPal guys who are friends of mine have been very, I think, advanced thinkers on that topic.
There are other, unconventional opportunities for clouding to drive innovation, and advanced thinkers are gravitating to the notion of anything as a service, or heck everything as a service (EvaaS).
But, like those who understand the benefits of diversity in race, gender and background, advanced thinkers are beginning to appreciate the potential of older people, and the vast opportunity for an upside of aging -- enhancing not only individual lives, but families, communities, workplaces, educational institutions, and societies at large.
Advanced thinkers might be advanced tinkerers.
"Hindhead itself", the obituarist added, "was a nest of advanced thinkers".
Skills: The fintech industry is vying and competing for engineers, software developers, cybersecurity analysts and advanced technological thinkers.
The notions of "truth" and "objective" knowledge and facts within science, while largely still exalted in the mainstream, have been advanced by critical thinkers to be more an "intersubjective" consensus among interested parties who at best remove their egos but rarely abandon their most basic biases favoring a shared reality from the collection of data and shared discourses.
This chapter outlines the arguments advanced by many prominent thinkers about development who have concluded that the policies of the International Financial Institutions (IFIs) were ill-designed, for they did not solve the problems they were supposed to, while at the same time they generated many new ones.
If they don't, I shall have to assume that over the intervening century the thinkers must have advanced to somewhere else.
Both women and men thinkers of the period advanced egalitarian arguments.
