The phrase "advanced particular" is not a standard expression in written English and may cause confusion.
It could potentially be used in a context where you are discussing a specific, detailed aspect of an advanced topic or subject matter.
Example: "In our research, we focused on an advanced particular of quantum mechanics that has not been widely studied."
Alternatives: "specific aspect" or "detailed element".
In her confirmation hearings before the Senate, she said science would be her guiding principle: "If I am confirmed, political appointees will not compromise the integrity of E.P.A.'s technical experts to advance particular regulatory outcomes".
'Freedom of association' guarantees the right to form groups in order to advance particular viewpoints.
But, if there are behind-the-scenes conspiracies and deals to advance particular political goals outside the democratic process, the Taliban would naturally be a part of that equation.
However, the role of advocacy and coalitions needs to problematized because organizations may not always fully represent their communities' views and, as a result, may advance particular interests, detracting from the democratic and grassroots nature of the organization.
Therefore, there is a considerable body of data that supports the hypothesis that Wnt-5a can advance particular cancer types, but is unlikely to be a primary or initiating event.
The theory - advanced in particular by Dr William James of the Galton Laboratory at University College London - is that it's parental hormone levels around the time of conception.
Anyone interested in seeing this argument advanced with particular verve and force should take up William Voegeli's recent book "Never Enough: America's Limitless Welfare State".
For centuries, physicians had been treating hysteria in their female patients with "pelvic massage," but in the early eighteen-eighties Dr. Joseph Mortimer Granville patented the first electromechanical vibrator, which advanced this particular medical procedure considerably.
Sometimes, this has yielded a comical result, as in Scalia's dissent in Edwards v. Aguillard, a 1987 decision overturning a pretty plainly labelled Louisiana law called the Balanced Treatment for Creation-Science and Evolution-Science Act on the grounds that it advanced a particular religious belief.
"This could be either to find out how far advanced some particular project was/is, or to steal some design(s) to sell on the black market.
