The phrase "advanced on behalf of the" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where someone is taking action or making a statement for someone else or a group.
Example: "The lawyer advanced on behalf of the client during the negotiations to ensure their interests were represented."
Alternatives: "acted for the" or "represented the".
The National Bank of Belgium, in an effort to redress the shortfall, advanced on behalf of the Belgian government the money needed for reconstruction.
We hold that insofar as the claim of sovereign immunity is advanced on behalf of the Tribe, rather than the individual defendants, it is well founded, but we reject petitioner Tribe's other contentions.
Other philosophers claim that the latter is not envy at all.5 Like many disputes over the nature of emotions, this one threatens to devolve into competing stipulations, but it can be understood as a substantive question about the character of an empirical phenomenon.[6] Some of the examples advanced on behalf of the suggested bifurcation threaten to obscure the issue.
Between 1923 and 1924, Scientific American magazine set up a committee to investigate Abrams's results [8] and concluded "the claims advanced on behalf of the electronic reactions of Abrams, and electronic practice in general, are not substantiated" [6].
If one of the reasons advanced on behalf of non-realism is that the traditional project fails, then ongoing philosophy of religion will still require investigating to determine whether in fact the tradition does fail.
Two dimensions of classification help to bring into focus the nature of the various arguments that have been advanced on behalf of miracle claims, one having to do with the aims of the arguments and the other having to do with their structure.
Lord Pentland held that the case advanced on behalf of Ms O'Brien for breach of contract was "misconceived".
Before moving to other arguments that have been advanced on behalf of nonconceptualism it is worth remarking that the conceptualist appeal to demonstrative concepts in response to the fineness of grain argument is a response to a challenge to their position, rather than an argument for conceptualism.
Human clinical studies involving substances like probiotics, however, have recently become more frequent in light of the need to substantiate benefit claims advanced on behalf of such substances.
Whatever might be advanced on behalf of mathematics and logic, many think, should work as well for morality.
Except, pardon the attorney in me stepping forward, I see a few ticklish issues here, which I fully expect will be advanced on behalf of any clients.
