The phrase "adsorption wavelength" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in scientific contexts, particularly in chemistry or physics, to refer to the specific wavelength at which a substance adsorbs light or other electromagnetic radiation.
Example: "The adsorption wavelength of the dye was measured to determine its effectiveness in the experiment."
Alternatives: "absorption wavelength" or "wavelength of adsorption".
With the Ni loading to the TiO2, the adsorption wavelength was enlarged to the visible range.
The change of the solubility of pyrene was monitored at 334 nm, its maximum adsorption wavelength, by UV VIS spectra.
The reflectance of the dyed sample was measured at the maximum adsorption wavelength on a Macbeth Coloreye 3100 spectrophotometer.
A broad adsorption peak with a maximum adsorption wavelength of 545 nm was observed via UV Vis spectroscopy.
Table 3 The calculated gap energy and adsorption wavelength of combined system of N3 and (TiO 2 ) 54 cluster Method Gap (eV) λ(nm) ONIOM 1.54 800 B3LYP 3.93 320 In the gas phase by ONIOM and B3LYP methods.
The red supernatant that was recovered from the cathepsin-B-treated, doxorubicin conjugated fUSE5-ZZ g8p DFK phages was further analyzed by HPLC at the specific adsorption wavelength of doxorubicin (480 nm).
Table 1 Absorbance data for dye desorption and dye readsorption onto ZnO ZnO dye Desorption Re-adsorption Wavelength (nm) Intensity Wavelength (nm) Intensity ZnO laali 350 0.36 352 0.39 ZnO methyl red 341 534 0.08 1.4 340 0.18 ZnO zobo 343 0.19 343 0.22.
By contrast, the absorption spectrum of the oxidized sample shows virtually no adsorption at wavelengths greater than 600 nm, indicating the complete oxidation of the Fe3O4 and wustite contents, respectively.
For the absorption spectra of the other five samples, run 1 and 2 show virtually no adsorption at wavelengths greater than 600 nm, while runs 3 5 show a broad hump attributed to magnetite.
They are calculated from different parameters (SUVA254 using low wavelength adsorption and DOC concentration; FI using a ratio of higher wavelength fluorescence and is independent of DOC) and are often evaluated together, because FI is not subject to the same interferences as SUVA254 (e.g., Fe concentration).
Without nitrogen doping, the sample T0 showed a slightly better degradation effect on MB compared with the P25 TiO2 nanoparticles under visible-light illumination, which could be attributed to its moderate light adsorption capability in the wavelength range from 400 to 500 nm as demonstrated in Figure 4a.
