The phrase "adsorption maximum" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in scientific contexts, particularly in chemistry or materials science, to refer to the highest amount of a substance that can be adsorbed onto a surface.
Example: "The adsorption maximum of the catalyst was determined to be 50 mg/g under the given experimental conditions."
Alternatives: "peak adsorption" or "maximum adsorption capacity".
The monolayer adsorption maximum capacity of HCop was estimated to be 34.85 mg g−1.
As the initial As V) loading increased to 50 mg g−1 sorbent, a distinct adsorption maximum was observed at pH 3.2 4.6.
The model predicts a concentration dependent adsorption maximum, non-congruent isotherms and non-linear plots for the inner layer potential differences.
The attachment of Enano-TiO2 particles to sediment surfaces enhanced markedly BET specific surface area and t-Plot external specific surface area, and thereby increased sediment phosphorus (P) adsorption maximum (Smax).
These adsorption maximum capacity of CF-PGMA-Cy fibres for Cu II) was found to be 28.6 mg/g at pH 5.2 and the adsorption kinetics fitted to the pseudo-second order model.
The maximum adsorption amount of LSB containing 20% loess can be 2 times greater than that of SB. Results also indicate that Pb II) is first adsorbed onto loess until the adsorption amount Pb II) onto loess reaches its adsorption maximum.
Batch tests showed adsorption maxima of 31.9 mg P g−1 and significant P removal was achieved in column tests.
The arsenate adsorption envelopes on NanoActive alumina exhibited broad adsorption maxima when the initial As V) loading was less than a 50 mg g−1 sorbent.
Simulations further indicate the presence of two adsorption maxima, which are located at φ = 12° and −48°.
Simulations yield, for both molecular configurations, multiple adsorption maxima, which are located for the blue marked enantiomer at φ max, blue = 42°, 57°, 102°, 161°, and 178°.
This ranking of the adsorbed amount persisted at all SDS concentrations, and the differences were very pronounced at the respective adsorption maxima, see also Table 3.
