The phrase "adsorption edge" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in scientific contexts, particularly in discussions related to materials science, chemistry, or physics, where the concept of adsorption is relevant.
Example: "The study focused on the adsorption edge of the material, which indicates the threshold at which significant adsorption occurs."
Alternatives: "adsorption threshold" or "adsorption limit".
Surface complexation stability constants for individual adsorption edge experiments were optimized using FITEQL4.0 [35].
Thus AgBr loading causes the adsorption edge of TiO2 to shift to the lower energy region.
Samples TiSn420 and TiSn430 have an adsorption edge corresponding to the rutile phase (~ 410 nm).
Moreover, the light adsorption edge first blue-shifts and then red-shifts with the increase of Sm content.
Additional reactor simulations indicate that reactor efficiency decreases dramatically with pH in the near acid region, coinciding with the adsorption edge for Fe2+ on Fe oxyhydroxide.
Furthermore, the fits obtained with the single-site model, although statistically inseparable at the 95% confidence interval from those of the 2-site model, fail to capture the dependence of the adsorption edges on sorbate/sorbent ratio (Fig. 1B).
From Fig. 5b, which shows the absorption spectra of the ITO films with different thicknesses, the adsorption edges shift to higher wavelengths, in good agreement with the transmission data.
Therefore, the Cu adsorption edges for HFO were used to derive a best-fit stability constant using the site density, protonation and deprotonation values recommended by Sverjensky and Sahai [38] and assuming monodentate adsorption of Cu on the single site, according to: >FeOH + Cu+2 aq) = >FeOCu+ + H+(aq).
The adsorption edges were modelled by a constant capacitance model using the following input data: gibbsite concentration: 20 g L−1, [≡SOH]: 120 mmol kg−1 (at a gibbsite concentration of 20 g L−1 corresponding to 2.4 mmol L−1), surface area: 11 m2 g−1, I0: 0.1 mol L−1, and volume of aqueous phase: 0.05 L.
For a given set of adsorption edges, the simplest model yielding a statistically superior V(Y), i.e. the model with the lowest V(Y) having no overlap with the 95% confidence interval of the next best model, was accepted as the best model.
