The phrase "adopts the constitution" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts discussing the formal acceptance or implementation of a constitution by a governing body or organization.
Example: "The newly elected government adopts the constitution to ensure the rule of law and protect citizens' rights."
Alternatives: "ratifies the constitution" or "endorses the constitution".
Libya will not become a modern state unless it adopts the constitution of 1969 as the basis of a secular constitution, and rejects the amendments that impose an Islamic state in the constitution.
With regards to the benefit basket, the National Assembly, i.e., a joint session of Sejm and Senate (lower and the upper chambers of Parliament), adopts the Constitution, among others, with its provisions dedicated to health protection.
Opposition to woman suffrage in the United States predated the Constitutional Convention (1787), which drafted and adopted the Constitution.
But preparing and adopting the constitution took seven years because of differences between political parties.
(If the AKP gained 367 seats, it could even to adopt the constitution in a parliamentary vote).
Parliamentary elections were held in September October 1990, after which a new National Assembly adopted the constitution of March 1991; the constitution has since been amended.
Only after Poland suffered these misfortunes did its political leaders adopt the Constitution of May 3, 1791, which abolished the liberum veto.
The regime of Fidel Castro adopted the constitution of Cuba, which mandated the operation of only one political party the Communist Party of Cuba.
In 1824 it adopted the constitution of the Federal Republic of Central America, a document similar in its liberal features to the Spanish constitution of 1812, providing for a federation of Guatemala, San Salvador, Honduras, Nicaragua, and Costa Rica.
Fidesz used its two-thirds supermajority in Parliament to adopt the Constitution, which critics say tightens the government's grip on the news media and the courts and dismantles democratic aspects of the judiciary.
Just as in Monaco with regard to foreign sovereigns, see id., at 330, there is no compelling evidence that the Founders thought that the States waived their immunity with regard to tribes when they adopted the Constitution.
