The phrase "adoption of functionality" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where you are discussing the implementation or acceptance of specific features or capabilities in a system or process.
Example: "The adoption of functionality in the new software update has significantly improved user experience."
Alternatives: "implementation of features" or "integration of capabilities."
Adoption of functionalities with financial benefits far exceeds adoption of those with safety and quality benefits.
Although ACS has been successfully deployed on commercial controllers, new releases of controllers will cause complications in the evolution of the software and adoption of future functionality.
The wide adoption of high-functionality smartphones by the general public highlights the increased demand for better mHealth services through smartphones [ 3- 6, 86].
We analyze data from a nationally representative sample of US EDs to ascertain the adoption of various EMR functionalities.
In addition to reporting adoption of various EMR functionalities, we used logistic regression to ascertain patient and hospital characteristics predicting "meaningful use," defined as a "basic" system (managing demographic information, computerized provider order entry, and lab and imaging results).
Instead, this Note advocates for critical internal reforms designed to improve the Program's efficiency and functionality, the adoption of a state enforcement mechanism, and reliance on principles of cooperative federalism and interagency cooperation.
IIS policy makers should also consider improving functionality and the adoption of new information technology; this may lead to efficiency improvements that can reduce total costs.
The accession 'By Name' page allows researchers to search through all accessions using only one or two letters of the name through the adoption of auto-completion and regular expression functionality.
Finally, we must be aware that policy changes will likely lead to improved consumer adoption of PHR, such as expanding its functionality, establishing standards for PHR information, facilitating the unencumbered secure exchange of health information, improving consumers' access to PHR, and helping consumers improve their understanding of the information contained in a PHR [ 28].
This is the "M" in the "MVP" rallying cry: identify the tiniest piece of functionality that is "viable" (leads to the intended market adoption, or supports users achieving their goal) and then launch only that.
Not only was Google+ Local a duplicate of functionality that is better served elsewhere, the app itself was struggling to gain adoption.
