The phrase "adoption conditions" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the requirements or criteria that must be met for an adoption process, whether it be for pets, children, or other contexts.
Example: "Before proceeding with the adoption, please review the adoption conditions outlined in our policy."
Alternatives: "adoption requirements" or "adoption criteria".
One example are Rutter's adversity events [ 8], which point to a combination of a set of family environment factors (including severe interparental discord, low-income class, numerous families, paternal criminality, maternal mental disorder, and children raised under adoption conditions) being strongly related to psychological disorders, including ADHD [ 9].
Among the population of neglected or abused adopted children treated through The Attachment and Trauma Center of Nebraska, for example, it is not uncommon to find a failure to thrive diagnosis early in life that is related to pre-adoption conditions.
The first hypothesis we test is that MTM adoption is conditioned by the characteristics of the smallholder farm, particularly its demographic characteristics, plot characteristics and market and credit access.
Model output suggests that the economic incentives associated with the use of diverse swards are too weak on their own to motivate wide-scale adoption under standard conditions.
The role change literature we used to conceptually inform our analysis suggests that role adoption under these conditions will be constrained.
If you adopt a guinea pig from a rescue center, make sure to ask why they are out up for adoption and any conditions they may have.
The second hypothesis is that MTM adoption is also conditioned by macro-level policy variables beyond the farm.
Even this intensional explication would still be vulnerable to the problems of irrelevant properties and the modus tollens paradox but for the adoption of a condition to exclude the occurrence of predicates that are not nomically relevant to the explanandum event from the explanans of an adequate scientific explanation.
Assuming donors and governments pick up the bill, the donations could be interpreted as market-priming – creating the conditions for adoption – rather than corporate citizenship.
The economic constrain paradigm states that input fixity in the short run, such as access to credit, land, labor or other critical inputs limits production flexibility and conditions technology adoption decisions (Uaiene et al. 2009).
