The phrase "adopting hypotheses" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the process of accepting or formulating hypotheses in a scientific or analytical context.
Example: "In the early stages of research, scientists often focus on adopting hypotheses that can guide their experiments."
Alternatives: "formulating hypotheses" or "accepting hypotheses".
Frankfurt then goes on to argue that a number of passages in Peirce's work suggest an understanding of abduction not so much as a process of inventing hypotheses but rather as one of adopting hypotheses, where the adoption of the hypothesis is not as being true or verified or confirmed, but as being a worthy candidate for further investigation.
He argued that those who reject the atomic hypothesis in favor of a continuum view of matter were guilty of adopting hypotheses too.
Furthermore, the adopted hypotheses in this problem are: All the machines are available at time zero.
The persistence of significant phylogenetic incongruence even after controlling for molecular saturation, and the limitations of current analyses when morphological data are collected without the expectation of saturation, cautions against the impulse to uncritically adopt hypotheses based on data combination.
We found, that only an anti-surfactant increasing the surface tension can destabilize the system under stated conditions and the adopted hypothesis.
This study employed a survey study design and adopted hypothesis-testing approaches to develop a capability-based KM evaluation framework (CKMEF) that upholds the basic assertions of the DCV.
Under the confidence level of 0.05, we adopt hypothesis test (Knowles et al. 2006) to demonstrate whether CEPGA can be applied to all protein ligand docking problem in Table 3.
The most commonly adopted hypothesis about the ectopic opening of the CBD was proposed by Boyden [ 8], who explained that the ectopic CBD opening was formed by coincidental subdivision of the primary hepatic furrow, as it becomes pars hepatica and pars cystica.
A number of hypotheses are proposed and the dangers of adopting unsubstantiated hypotheses are stressed.
I also discuss the implications of adopting conservative hypotheses before proceeding to what is, in essence, a conditional uncertainty analysis, and I explore some implications of different levels of "conservatism" for the ranking of risk mitigation measures.
Principally, the main finding is not novel – it is made to appear novel only by adopting strawman hypotheses, ignoring much of the relevant and recent literature.
