The 2015 memo seeks to streamline policy that involves managing adverse impacts to biodiversity, known as mitigation, largely by adhering to the mitigation hierarchy and adopting landscape-level planning efforts across all land managing departments.
In this article, we consider that except for avoiding the risks by site selection on the map, risk adaptation methods should be adopted at landscape scale.
To overcome this challenge, we adopted a landscape mosaic approach to assess the changes between natural forests, shifting cultivation and permanent cultivation systems at the regional level from 1995 to 2011.
To achieve this goal, a coalition of governmental and non-governmental partners from Nepal and India adopted a landscape-scale conservation strategy to connect twelve protected areas across the Himalayan foothills with habitat linkages to facilitate species dispersal and seasonal movements.
Our study suggests that watershed management should adopt better landscape planning and multi-scale measures to improve water quality.
This study improves the EDEN DEMs of the Loxahatchee National Wildlife Refuge, also known as Water Conservation Area 1 (WCA1), by adopting a landscape unit (LU) based interpolation approach.
It thus follows that adopting a landscape ecological perspective to metapopulation dynamics entails understanding how a spatial pattern, such as habitat fragmentation or heterogeneity, affects the processes that contribute to the dynamics of spatially structured populations.
They also highlight the importance of adopting a landscape or regional perspective on potential changes to land-use in rural environments, and on the conservation management of small reserves.
The linear area of the route corridor and its diverse surrounding locality necessitate adopting a landscape approach to examine the on-site experiences of its visitors, through data collected using the visitor-employed photograph (VEP) technique, supplemented with interviews.
