The phrase "adopted in the case" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in legal or formal contexts to refer to a decision, rule, or principle that has been accepted or implemented in a specific situation or case.
Example: "The ruling adopted in the case set a new precedent for future legal interpretations."
Alternatives: "implemented in the matter" or "accepted in the instance".
This approach, generally adopted in the case of interurban road projects is also applicable to small urban localities.
The government's decision to cancel Newman's visa is a different process from the one adopted in the case of Brown, whose travel was scheduled for December.
Yet diplomatic cables have shown scepticism over the charges against him - along with initial concerns over the "relatively comfortable" tone adopted in the case.
HVdc systems are adopted in the case of long distance power transmission, interconnection of two large ac systems or power transmission by cables to overloaded districts or isolated islands.
Flanked by American and Australian civil liberties lawyers at a news conference in New York, the father, Terry Hicks, pleaded for Washington to apply the same legal standards to his son David that were adopted in the case of John Walker Lindh, who pleaded guilty last year in federal court to aiding the Taliban and carrying explosives and was sentenced to 20 years in a civilian prison.
The real data of Jiangxi provincial power grid was adopted in the case study.
Rule 2 will be adopted in the cases of very low frequencies, therefore the influence on the accuracy is limited, which is confirmed through a number of simulation studies.
Figure 9 P t th -order polyphase architecture for FBMC transmitters with rational normalized frequency separation factor Q. The approach adopted in the previous case would lead to time-variant architectures for the present case of Bt=Nss.
In the first case, nearly as many people would "win" if the policy change was rejected as if it was adopted; in the second case, refusing to change the policy would be a dramatic deviation from what the public wants.
239, 240, 81 L.Ed. 294, and he suggests that the views therein stated be adopted in the present case in preference to those embodied in the Panhandle Oil Case, supra.
A similar procedure was adopted in the controversial case of Roisin McAliskey (see solicitor Gareth Pierce's letter in the Guardian on Monday).
