Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
The phrase "adopted arguments" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to arguments or positions that have been accepted or taken on by an individual or group.
Example: "In the debate, the team presented several adopted arguments to support their stance on climate change."
Alternatives: "accepted arguments" or "embraced arguments".
Exact(1)
Senator Edward M. Kennedy, Democrat of Massachusetts, said the memorandum showed that the administration "adopted arguments that could be used by other nations to try to justify the torture of American troops".
Similar(59)
"In 2017, the department reversed course, adopting arguments nearly identical to those put forward by Trump's private sector lawyers.
He added that in some cases that meant a nation would adopt arguments and strategies that might look risky, but over time would prove beneficial.
Sometimes, this will involve adopting arguments that don't really reflect yourself and your own political views.
I would be remiss if I didn't make clear that the just adopt argument is ignorant, plain and simple.
France, in particular, is supporting the spigot approach, but it has taken stock of political realities and adopted its arguments for a generous aid program to include the new interest in improved environmental standards.
This year, as nearly every state legislature considered bills to revamp its civil liability systems, limits on monetary settlements, or caps, were among the most popular remedies adopted despite arguments that they deny injured people the settlements they deserve.
The Theory and Regulation of Love, a piece characterizing love as the summons of God, was published in 1688, and the first text in which Norris clearly adopted Malebranchean arguments.
The association adopted her argument and used it widely.
Evolutionary psychologists adopted this argument, using it to explain everything from sexual differences in dating behavior to the appeal of potato chips.
If adopted, this argument would turn the Hollingsworth case into the gay-rights equivalent of Loving v. Virginia, the 1967 landmark decision that said states could no longer ban interracial marriage.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com