Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(4)
This paper reports on a study that adopted a mixed method research design to explore the impact of action research on English language teacher candidates' self-efficacy beliefs in a 14-week course in which action research was utilised.
Thus we adopted a mixed method qualitative approach that involves two phases.
This study adopted a mixed method approach to answer the research questions: (1) How does an arts-based activity affect medical student empathy and (2) What other impacts does an arts-based activity have on medical students?
This study adopted a mixed method approach to the content analysis, which involved two distinct stages and two distinct assumptions: first, a quantitative content analysis was performed assuming positivist approach;[ 33] second, the theme contents were summarized assuming a critical realist approach [ 34].
Similar(56)
This study adopted a mixed methods research design.
The study adopted a mixed methods design participatory collaborative action research and community research to develop a series of case studies.
This research adopted a mixed methods CBPR approach to triangulate collected data to inform the development of a model of care for a remote Indigenous drug and alcohol residential rehabilitation service.
Thus, the study adopted a mixed methods approach involving observation of work in a simulator and cab rides, observation of work using videos and training media, focus groups interviews, and one-to-one interviews with experts.
The project adopted a mixed methods design aimed at benefitting research participants and included: participatory collaborative action research (Anderson 2017; Kemmis et al. 2013; Lozenski 2014) and, community research (Smith 2012).
The study adopted a mixed methods, explanatory sequential design, with two phases, beginning with the collection and analysis of quantitative data through an online questionnaire, followed by the collection and analysis of qualitative data through semi-structured interviews (Driscoll et al. 2007).
We adopted a mixed methods approach to evaluation.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com