The phrase "adopt with a" is not correct and does not convey a clear meaning in written English.
It may be intended to express the idea of adopting something in conjunction with another element, but it lacks clarity and proper context.
Example: "We need to adopt with a new strategy to improve our performance." (This example is awkward and unclear.)
Alternatives: "embrace alongside" or "implement with a".
These people are more than the lightly sketched personas that comedians so often adopt with a few catchphrases or some exaggerated facial expressions.
Those tears, however - to adopt with a little variation the language of a noble poet with respect to another young and accomplished princess, - - "were virtue's tears auspicious to those much-loved isles".
In ordinary life, for instance, most of us are not aware of the proper course to adopt with a bull that desires to sleep in one's tent, a rustic who mistakes it for a new branch of the local public-house or a kettle that refuses to boil before the spirit is exhausted when the nearest shop is some six miles away.
So we are able to serve a need by reducing the use of euthanasia and providing those who want to adopt with a great animal that may not have happened otherwise.
It is noteworthy that stroke reduction was found in RECORD with a likelihood ratio of 0.72, in ADOPT with a ratio of 0.77, in early RGZ studies with a ratio of 0.48, and in PROactive with a ratio of 0.81.
I suggest this is what has happened here and is a good principle to adopt with an event like the 7/7 bombings.
For a child to be adopted with a no-contact order suggests there has been a high level of abuse and a demonstrable lack of ability to change.
Gunn's role in Abush's life wasn't godmotherly; rather, it resembled that of an "ordinary parent with a child conceived or adopted with a now-estranged partner".
The report recommendations for the NHS have been adopted with a target that by 2020-21, at least a million people with mental health problems will be accessing high-quality care they aren't getting today.
The Supreme Court ruled today in an important voting rights case that the Justice Department must approve districting changes, even those adopted with a discriminatory purpose, as long as the changes left minority voters in no worse a position than before.
A1 The court ruled, 5 to 4, that the Justice Department must approve districting changes, even those adopted with a discriminatory purpose, as long as minority voters are left in no worse a position than previously.
