The phrase "adopt to customer" is not correct in English.
Did you mean "adapt to customer"? You can use "adapt to customer" when discussing the need to change or modify something to meet the needs or preferences of a customer.
Example: "In order to succeed in this market, we must adapt to customer demands and preferences."
Alternatives: "adjust to customer" or "tailor to customer".
More importantly, retirement housing developers will need to adopt to their new customers' changing expectations about the good life in retirement.
On the other hand, for customers without smart meters, utility functions are usually adopted to represent customers' electricity use behaviors and preferences [17, 18, 19].
The general perception from the customer and the supplier was that a more flexible model had been adopted to meet the customer's business needs and to live up to his expectations in terms of supply, as expressed in the SLA.
Making its service appealing and usable to those outside of the current demographics that use it is essential to achieving that goal, and price cuts are an important strategy that the company adopts to widen its customer base.
Take the tactics that Avaya, a maker of call center technology, is adopting to win and keep customers.
Although existing various mechanisms have been adopted to guarantee trust between customers and sellers (or platforms), self-interested agents often impose various attacks to trust and reputation systems.
A thriving industry comprised of consultants dedicated to training companies how to adopt exemplary customer service has blossomed over the past couple decades.
"Telcos and banks haven't been able to move to mobile wallets is because it requires them to adopt new customer behavior.
"Ready and Willing: Restaurant Customers' View of Payment Technology" by Sheryl E. Kimes Ph.D. and Joel Collier Ph.D. Restaurant guests seem enthusiastically ready to adopt customer facing payment technologies, at least in casual restaurants, according to this study of the views of 1,297 U.S. consumers.
In an effort to demolish a foundation stone of the prosecution case as the testimony neared an end in federal court in Manhattan, the defense focused on a 1993 document said to list tougher trade terms that the nominal archrivals had agreed to adopt against customers.
