The phrase "admissible to" is correct and usable in written English.
It is typically used in legal or formal contexts to indicate that something is acceptable or allowable within a certain framework or set of rules.
Example: "The evidence presented in court was deemed admissible to the case, allowing the jury to consider it during deliberations."
Alternatives: "acceptable for" or "permissible in".
The Classical schools long retained their social prestige and a definite educational advantage in that only their pupils were admissible to the universities.
We know from well-publicised surveys that many academics feel under pressure to publish work that will be admissible to the Research Excellence Framework.
For his part, Mr. Bruno said: "I know they say the neighborhood is against this, but since that petition was not admissible to the board they can't prove it.
In the words of the rule, "Evidence of a person's character or character trait is not admissible to prove that on a particular occasion the person acted in accordance with the character or trait".
"What they do isn't high-level trolling, of the kind Cooper's concerned with; it isn't death or rape threats, it isn't anonymous," she said, arguing that people felt it was admissible to attack her after columnists wrote negatively about the book.
And too often, despite everyone's best efforts, the police are left trying to find support for someone who has either been assessed as not having a psychiatric disorder and therefore is not admissible to hospital, or is under the influence of alcohol or drugs and so cannot be assessed.
In this paper, we use the concept of α-admissible to study fixed point theorems for expansive mappings satisfying -contractive conditions in a complete metric spaces.
But the road from that extraordinary admission, to proof admissible in court, to a conviction is likely to be a very long and bumpy one.
"The school also gives me this position to ensure that you are admissible and to provide a recommendation to complete an application".
Then, of course, you'd have to have enough admissible evidence to prove liability.
Unfortunately, they lack enough admissible evidence to get a jury to convict.
