The phrase "admissibility to" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts related to eligibility or acceptance, often in legal or formal settings.
Example: "The admissibility to the court of the evidence presented was a key factor in the trial's outcome."
Alternatives: "eligibility for" or "acceptance into".
"Admissibility to Canada is decided on a case by case basis and based on the information made available to the officer at the time of entry.
However, that doesn't mean they are refugees under U.S. law quite yet -- for that to happen, UNHCR has to formally refer a person for resettlement, and then the Department of Homeland Security has to make a decision on admissibility to the United States".
For example, a driven, goal-oriented student is more likely to attain success in a medical career as these criteria are often used to judge admissibility to the profession.
On 16 December 2003, the Trial Chamber admitted the 245 intercepts into evidence on a prima facie basis and reserved its final ruling with respect to admissibility subject to a determination of the relevance and reliability of the intercepts (Prosecutor v. Milošević 16 December 2003b).
The draft proposes to change the admissibility criteria to oust the court's jurisdiction except where there is a "serious" question of interpretation or where domestic courts have "clearly erred".
"The law generally places a thumb on the side of admissibility of evidence like this, requiring the opponent of admission to show a particularly good reason for exclusion".
In September, the Chamber issued its second decision with respect to the admissibility of the SDC materials, in which it granted admission to the remainder of the SDC materials.
Here, admissibility refers to the usual requirement that the portfolio value of a strategy must be bounded from below for all considered price trajectories.
M x /G/1 queue with random set-up time with a Bernoulli vacation schedule under a restricted admissibility policy to obtain queue size distribution was generalized by Choudhury (2008).
Article 17(1) allows several routes for an admissibility challenge to the Court's jurisdiction, and Kenya made the argument that it was already investigating the "case" on a good faith basis and it was thus immune from ICC jurisdiction.
Moreover, weak solutions are not necessarily unique and further admissibility criteria need to be imposed in order to single out a physically relevant solution.
