The phrase "administration innovation" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing new methods, ideas, or practices within the context of administration or management.
Example: "The company is focusing on administration innovation to improve efficiency and streamline processes."
Alternatives: "administrative innovation" or "management innovation".
Obviously as a city we're standing strong and united to protect our Sanctuary City but the bi-product of the executive order could be that we lose funding, especially when it comes to grants that this office has benefited greatly under President Obama's administration for innovation and for social justice projects within the office.
The Trump administration's innovation is to manufacture criminal proceedings by reducing prosecutors' power to decline to prosecute mothers who cross the border with their children.
Yes, teachers are tired of the humiliations that are dumped on us as a predictable response by management to the Duncan administration's "innovations".
In the short run, those miraculous technologies will primarily benefit low-poverty schools that are not being oppressed by NCLB, and the Duncan Administration's "innovations" that impose more bubble-in testing on our lowest-performing 10% of schools.
Grover Whitehurst, a former head of the Education Department's research arm who is now at the Brookings Institution, said some educational ideas heralded in past administrations as "innovations," like accelerated middle school programs, had since been proved effective.
And through an innovative public-private partnership, earlier this month the CAS-Carrera program was awarded a $3.5 million grant from the Edna McConnell Clark Foundation and the Obama administration's Social Innovation Fund (SIF) to deepen the program's impact in New York City and further replicate it nationally.
Not really, but his administration could slow innovation and adoption of new tests.
I shared the view that the administration should make innovation one of its key pillars, which would create a huge number of jobs across the whole country, in all sectors, not just tech — agriculture, infrastructure, manufacturing — everywhere.
Beth Noveck, a law professor at NYU Law School and a member of the Obama Administration's "Technology, Innovation and Government Reform Team", stated that the book would help the government "get the best ideas for the beginning of the administration".
Whatever the case, though, nothing about Mohammed Hashim's story suggests that he should be standing trial in a court flagged up by the administration as an innovation required to prosecute "the worst of the worst," who were directly responsible for the 9/11 attacks.
