Such adjustments are, however, only appropriate when the antecedents of both exposure and disease, or their joint distributions, are available for the entire study population (Greenland, 1998).
A significant decrease in absolute difference and absolute percent asymmetry before vs. after adjustment was, however, identified for the shaft width and the neck-shaft angle.
The associations were, however, attenuated after adjustment for place of residence, particularly for seeing a geriatrician.
Such a precise adjustment would be however extremely time consuming and probably not worthwhile.
For evaluation after PC adjustment, it is however important to avoid the potential bias that can arise from SNPs highly correlated to the initial structure inference SNP set.
However, adjustments were made for all known risk factors and the categorisation was comparatively detailed.
However, adjustments were not made for margin status and the use of systemic therapy, which are two of the most important clinical determinants of local control.
The administrative hospital data used to identify rates of pressure ulcer and FTR in these other studies was not linked when identifying records with nursing-sensitive outcomes of pressure ulcer and FTR which may account for their higher rates; however adjustments were made for comorbidities [ 40, 45- 48].
After body weight adjustment, this difference was however not significant (P = 0.07).
However, statistical adjustments were made for the obvious confounding factors including type of bleeding, surgical experience, removal method and the site, nature, size and number of uterine polyps.
