The phrase "adjustments for children" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing modifications or changes made to accommodate the needs of children in various contexts, such as education, healthcare, or policy-making.
Example: "The school implemented several adjustments for children with learning disabilities to ensure they receive the support they need."
Alternatives: "modifications for children" or "accommodations for children".
Model I includes adjustments for child's sex; Model II includes adjustments for child's sex, gestational age, admission to neonatal ward during the first ten days, multiple pregnancy, mother's smoking during pregnancy, parental education, maternal age and maternal height.
There was no statistically significant difference between information sharing and initial positive social adjustment for children who only had one or the other type of information sharing compared to children who had no information sharing reported for them.
Adjustments for quality-of-life while living with HIV were considered as a yearly adjustment for adults and a lifetime adjustment for children.
For example, among children with mental and behavioural disorders, children of caregivers with adjustment for children's age, sex, caregiver child relationship and caregivers' age.
Silk et al. [ 51] demonstrated high levels of parent child relationship quality were associated with high positive adjustment for children, except for those experiencing high or chronic neighborhood risks.
However, this association was attributable to the greater height of children who were heavier at birth (birth weight × lean mass: r = 0.081, P = 0.70, after adjustment for children's height).
A general linear model was fitted to generate least-square means and SEs of sleep efficiency across caregivers' education levels with adjustment for children's age, sex, disability, caregiver child relationship, and caregivers' age.
After adjustment for children's age and sex, caregiver HCC were positively and significantly related to child weight (kg) (beta = 4.47; standard error (SE) = 2.09), BMI (kg/m) (beta = 1.52; SE = 0.71), neck circumference (cm) (beta = 1.20; SE = 0.43), waist circumference (cm) (beta = 3.75; SE = 1.50), and hip circumference (cm) (beta = 3.02, SE = 1.48).
In particular, the upward potency adjustment for children (10-fold for the first 2 years of life, 3-fold for the next 14 years) amounts to only a factor of 1.7 over the life span, which provides scant protection for susceptible adults exposed throughout life, and no additional protection for adults whose exposures begin or increase after 16 years of age.
We observed a low to moderate correlation between the overall COHIP-SF 19, subscale scores and clinical severity indicators as well as self-perceived health ratings, after adjustment for children's age, gender, and school district (│ r s │ =0.11 - 0.51, P <0.05).
