Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(17)
After adjustment, the risk of death in the highest IL-10 quartile remained (adjusted odds ratio 2.6; 95% CI, 1.3 to 5.1) (p = 0.007) (table 2).
After adjustment, the risk of relapse was 4.51 times (P<0.001) higher for MRDpos patients.
After multivariable adjustment, the risk of revision remained 2.4 times higher for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty than for total knee arthroplasty (95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.03 to 2.83).
After risk adjustment, the risk of CV hospitalization/revascularization and all-cause mortality/myocardial infarction/revascularization in patients with and without AP was similar regardless of DM status (all p ≥0.05).
After adjustment, the risk of discontinuation was higher with increasing age (P =.005) and lower for stage ≥ IIB (v stage I) disease (P =.003).Frailty is associated with noninitiation of hormonal therapy, but it does not seem to be a major predictor of early discontinuation in older patients.
After age adjustment, the risk of dying was 1.66 (95% CI: 1.58, 1.75) times greater for men and 1.53 (95% CI: 1.43, 1.63) for women living in the most deprived areas compared to those living in the least deprived areas.
Similar(43)
Thereafter models were sequentially adjusted for case-mix factors (model 2) and case-mix and hospital factors (model 3).To illustrate the differences in hospital repeat caesarean section rates after each step of adjustment, the risk-adjusted hospital rates with 95%% confidence intervals were plotted.
Even with those adjustments, the risk of dying in the next 5 years was still 35% lower for the happiest people.
After adjustments the risk of adolescent childbearing for the 2nd generation was 35% higher for women whose mothers had been pregnant during adolescence – RR = 1.35 (95% CI 1.04-1.74).
Adjustment for the risk factors, including BMI, only slightly attenuated the RRs adjusted only for age.
The risk of MI associated with increased IL-10 was not significantly elevated after adjustment for the risk indicators in model 1 (table 2).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com