The phrase "adjustment presence" is not commonly used in written English and may not convey a clear meaning.
It could potentially be used in contexts related to psychology or therapy, where it might refer to the presence of adjustments in a person's state or behavior.
Example: "The therapist noted the adjustment presence in her client's demeanor during the session."
Alternatives: "state of adjustment" or "presence of adjustment".
In contrast, after multivariable adjustment, presence of any other adult in the household and maternal insurance did not significantly affect adherence (Table 5).
Examples are the use of nitrates (medication adjustment), presence of anxiety or depression (psychotherapy), visual impairment (correction of vision), and impaired function of lower extremities (physiotherapy).
After multivariable adjustment, presence of clinical A1C was independently associated with higher GTI rates in each glucose control subgroup, versus patients with laboratory A1C only (1.30 [1.06–1.59] for A1C <7%, 2.14 [1.13–4.04] for A1C 7–9%, and 1.78 [1.06–2.97] for A1C >9%; interaction P = 0.30).
In some of these studies, an adjustment for presence of hypertension and diabetes was performed, indicating that albuminuria is an independent risk factor on top of diabetes and hypertension, but it is not clear whether the increased risk was also present in those with normal blood pressure and glucose levels [21].
However, this survival advantage was not maintained after adjustment, indicating presence of selection bias.
Thereby a D-shaped segmentation is obtained after adjustment for presence of outflow tract.
After adjustment, only presence of HPV DNA, parity and history of previous smears remained as independent risk factors.
Eight family variables were studied in association with parental adjustment: partner presence, marital adjustment, family income, family size, family coping style, impact on family, negative family environment, and positive family environment [see Additional file 2].
It is expected that by this adjustment, rbST presence can not only be detected but also confirmed up to 14 days after rbST administration.
In our study, a very small fraction of patient (4%) had renal failure, anyway fotemustine, differently from melphalan, would not require dose adjustment in presence of renal impairment.
Congruently adjustment for presence of the metabolic syndrome did not alter the point estimate for the relation between HOMA-IR and the composite endpoint (tertile 2 vs 1 HR 1.92 95%CI 1.20-3.08; tertile 3 vs1 (HR 1.78; 95%CI 1.10-2.90).
