The phrase "adjustment of sampling" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts related to research, data collection, or statistical analysis where modifications to sampling methods or techniques are discussed.
Example: "The adjustment of sampling was necessary to ensure that the data collected accurately represented the population."
Alternatives: "modification of sampling" or "alteration of sampling".
This adjustment of sampling points in turn changes the error information and affects filter coefficients for pulse amplitude modulation.
However, the variations of diffusion coefficients at different temperatures needs to be considered and the adjustment of sampling constant was a must when sampling at temperatures different from 25°CC.
The optimization of sample sizes and the adjustment of sampling strategy will not only facilitate fieldwork and render analyses and interpretation more reliable, but will also ultimately allow reconstruction of time series of past mass movements with reasonable temporal efforts and excellent cost-benefit ratios.
When respondents declined to be interviewed, their characteristics (namely gender, approximate age, nationality, type of dwelling) were recorded to allow for the adjustment of sampling weights.
At each occasion, plots are allocated independently from assessments at previous occasions, allowing for a flexible adjustment of sampling intensities over time.
This real time adjustment of sampling characteristics allowed us to compensate during the data collection process.
A wide variety of treatments were used in an attempt to overcome this effect, including use of both synthetic saliva and stripped human saliva for standard preparation, use of bovine serum albumin (BSA) to reduce non-specific binding of contaminants, pH adjustment of samples and/or standards and use of different antibodies.
It does not entirely depend on sample plots that are installed at the first occasion but allows for the adjustment of sample sizes and placement of new plots at any occasion.
The method was first given formal mathematical treatment by Deming and Stephan (1940), based on a restricted least-squares criterion, in the context of the adjustment of sample estimates to fixed census marginal totals in the construction of contingency tables.
Coarse and fine adjustment of sample focus is done using a piezo actuator combined with a differential micrometer (DRV517, Thorlabs).
The remaining difference was not significant, but the probability of covering the rates with prediction intervals for Sweden continued to be lower after adjustment of sample size.
