Sentence examples for adjustment odds from inspiring English sources

RESULTS: Unadjusted mortality decreased across volume categories from 2.6% (< 100 cases) to 1.7% (> 450 cases, P <.0001), and these differences persisted after risk factor adjustment (odds ratio for lowest- vs highest-volume group, 1.49).

The proportion of patients receiving pneumococcal vaccination was 66% overall and decreased over the study period from 71% in 2013 to 60% in 2016 (p < 0.001), remaining significant after adjustment (odds ratio: 0.75 per calendar year; 95% CI: 0.67 to 0.84).

The proportion of patients receiving influenza vaccination was 68% overall and declined from 70% in 2012 to 2013 to 66% in 2016 to 2017 (p < 0.001), although this was not statistically significant after adjustment (odds ratio: 1.05 per flu season; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.94 to 1.18).

On the other hand, for those who divorced or were widowed after mid-life, after adjustment odds ratios reached only borderline significance (table 4).

NT-proBNP was significantly related to mortality (odds ratio 1.603, 95% confidence interval 1.407 1.826; P<0.001) and the significance persisted after full adjustment (odds ratio 1.282, 95% confidence interval 1.103 1.489; P=0.001).

HPR was more prevalent in patients with anemia (58.3% vs 38.4%; p <0.001), an association that persisted after multivariate adjustment (adjusted odds ratio: 2.04; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.82 to 2.29; p <0.0001).

Higher social isolation score remained significantly associated with self-harm after adjustment (adjusted odds ratio per standard deviation increase 2.92, 95% confidence interval 1.44-5.95) and household size was negatively associated with the outcome (adjusted odds ratio per unit increase 0.54, 95% CI 0.32-0.94).

Prompted group patients had lower risk-adjusted ICU mortality compared with the control group (odds ratio, 0.36; 95% confidence interval, 0.13-0.96; P = 0.041) and lower hospital mortality compared with the control group (10.0 vs. 20.8%; P = 0.014), which remained significant after risk adjustment (adjusted odds ratio, 0.34; 95% confidence interval, 0.15-0.76; P = 0.008).

In contrast, WCR was significantly related to CIMT (only in women) and carotid atherosclerosis, even after adjustment (adjusted odds ratio for carotid atherosclerosis for the highest quartile of WCR compared with the lowest quartile being 1.178 [95% CI 1.026 1.353] and 1.276 [1.053 1.545] in men and women, respectively).

Without the additional adjustment the adjusted odds ratios for ≤ 2 or > 2 prescriptions were 0.97 (95% CI: 0.77, 1.2) and 0.83 (95% CI: 0.61, 1.1), respectively.

After adjustment, the adjusted odds ratio (AOR) was 2.1 95% CI 0.8-5.8 P = 0.14 for gel compared to powder on ECV success, a non-significant result.