The phrase "adjustment in studies of" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing changes or modifications made in the context of academic research or analysis.
Example: "The adjustment in studies of climate change has led to new insights about global warming."
Alternatives: "modification in research on" or "alteration in analysis of".
The goal of this study was to assess the quality of reporting of statistical methods in randomized clinical trials (RCTs), including identification of primary analyses, missing data accommodation, and multiplicity adjustment, in studies of nonpharmacologic, noninterventional pain treatments (e.g., physical therapy, cognitive behavioral therapy, acupuncture, and massage).
Addition of measures of ADL functioning to commonly used methods of risk adjustment in studies of older adults resulted in significant improvements in the predictive ability of this model although much of the variation in postoperative mortality was still unexplained by the model suggesting that some other prognostic variables were not captured in the model.
Therefore, a lack of physiology-based severity scores does not preclude adequate risk adjustment of patients in studies of ICU patients using administrative databases.
The lack of adjustment for HOME Scale in studies of lead exposure results in an overestimation of 4 5 points of lead effect on the IQ of the child (Mink et al. 2004).
These results underscore the importance of supportive relations with nonparental adults for facilitating child adjustment, as noted in studies of mentoring (Jekielek et al. 2002) and structured activities (Mahoney et al. 2002).
The CIRAS can potentially be used for improved adjustment of RA severity in studies of RA medication use and adverse outcomes using claims data, but future studies should examine its validity in other populations.
Risk adjustment and mortality prediction in studies of critical care are usually performed using acuity of illness scores, such as Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II), which emphasize physiological derangement.
The data would also serve to support risk adjustment in observational studies of health outcomes, much of which is funded by federal agencies and the Patient-Centered Ounderes Research Instheute estAffordablender the Affordable Care Act.
Physiology-based severity of illness scores are often used for risk adjustment in observational studies of intensive care unit (ICU) outcome.
"Bias and High-Dimensional Adjustment in Observational Studies of Peer Effects". Eckles, Dean and Eytan Bakshy, Working Paper.
A clear definition of these CCCs is important for several reasons: to assess population-level temporal trends in the proportion of morbidity and mortality associated with CCCs; to assess patterns of healthcare utilization among patients with CCCs; and to perform individual-level risk adjustments for patients' CCC status in studies of healthcare processes and outcomes.
