The phrase "adjustment classification" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts related to categorizing or organizing adjustments, such as in finance, psychology, or data analysis.
Example: "The adjustment classification for the financial report will help us understand the impact of recent changes on our budget."
Alternatives: "modification categorization" or "alteration classification".
Results: Consistency in adjustment classification was only 31-32% for child self-report, 66% for mother-reported child behavior problems, and 56-77% for mother self-reported adjustment for the CF and SCD groups, respectively.
This review should include serious reconsideration of the reimbursement of the identifiable costs for post adjustment classification and cost of living adjustments which since they must be paid to the staff whose emoluments were charged to agency costs, further aggravated the position.
Knowledge of this function potentially allows adjustment of classification performance to take account of the effect of response size, making comparisons across brain areas, categories or people more meaningful.
According to The New York Times, the adjustment in classification was made in 2010 and defined strangulation in the first-and-second degree to be felonies, with third-degree strangulation classified as a misdemeanor.
19– 21 Epidemiologic studies that rely on these self-reports of cancer in family members without adjustment for classification errors can provide inaccurate results and underestimates of the true uncertainty.
This scheme can initially cluster large datasets unsupervised and then allows for adjustment of the classification by the user.
We present a method to adjust for inter-observer differences in VAS density estimates and examine the effect of adjustment on the classification of women at high risk of developing breast cancer.
We evaluated an automatic procedure of CRC detection using MALDI-TOF spectra based on: (i) discrete wavelet transformation; (ii) selection of discriminative wavelet coefficients using the non-parametric difference tests with multiplicity adjustment; (iii) SVM classification.
According to Tsay et al. [ 14] the subgroups are named NRT1/PTR-I, II, III and IV although our data would suggest an adjustment of this classification, as the members of the NRT1/PTR-I group are not monophyletic.
Konijn [11] and Konijn and Steenge [12] argue that remaining negatives clearly indicate that some classification adjustments must be made or some further research on errors data must be developed.
The current official view of the issue will be expounded with all relevant critical points and a proposal will be advanced for changes and adjustments to the classification of the main CDH subchapter: the one about migraine that evolves unfavourably over time.
