Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(2)
*95% confidence intervals were calculated for the main outcome measures adjusting for strata (deprivation level), primary sampling unit (clusters) and weight (for Finglas only).
For binary outcomes, adjustment was done by calculating the expected number of cases at each time point in each cluster using generalised estimating equation logistic regression, adjusting for strata, case type, age and gender and within-individual correlation between visits.
Similar(58)
The Barthel ADL, NEADL scale, fear of falling scale was compared between treatment arms using linear regression or logistic regression categorising the outcome at the median if the assumptions of linear regression were not met and adjusting for stratum and baseline characteristics.
(Number of women) *Mean differences and 95% CIs adjusted for strata.
For the women's survey, the average values of the event rates of satisfaction outcomes were compared between arms, using a rate difference and a t-test at the cluster level, obtaining the standard errors for the difference from a variance analysis adjusted for strata.
*Effect size estimates adjusted for stratum (primary care trust).
*Difference in improvement between integrated care and usual care adjusted for stratum and type of hospital.
This analysis will adjust for stratum, the lead agency of the children's centre and Ofsted report scores for overall effectiveness and capacity for sustained improvement.
These analyses will adjust for stratum, the lead agency of the children's centre and Ofsted report scores for overall effectiveness and capacity for sustained improvement [ 29].
The effects of integrated care compared with usual care, adjusted for stratum and type of hospital, were obtained from the longitudinal mixed model.
The main analysis was adjusted for stratum (trial centre) and also for baseline characteristics considered to be strong prognostic factors for falls (age, sex and the screening items) [ 13– 15].
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com