The phrase "adjusting for indicators" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where one is accounting for or modifying data based on specific indicators or metrics.
Example: "In our analysis, we are adjusting for indicators such as economic growth and inflation rates to ensure accurate results."
Alternatives: "accounting for metrics" or "modifying for variables".
In addition to adjusting for indicators of family socioeconomic position, our analyses were also adjusted for diet and physical activity because these are possible confounding factors in the relationship between socioeconomic context of the neighborhood and BMI [ 27].
Adjusting for indicators of healthy and unhealthy eating habits (such as fruits and vegetables, fish, and soft drinks), maternal BMI, and indicators of socioeconomic status, did not substantially alter associations among the subset of the population with available data.
Although children living in remote areas were less likely to receive ventilation tubes than children living in major cities in the unadjusted model, this difference was not significant after adjusting for indicators of socioeconomic status (table 3).
Main Outcome Measures: Program effectiveness was estimated by gains in motor and cognitive subscale scores of the FIM[trade ] instrument between admission and discharge, adjusted for indicators of caseload severity at admission.
Third, models were further adjusted for indicators of psychopathology, including all sub-scales of the YSR, except for the somatic complaints sub scale.
Additionally, in all models, we adjusted for indicators of diabetes severity that had particular potential to confound our results (BMI, disease duration, and treatment).
All analyses were adjusted for indicators of individual level socioeconomic status (SES), including higher educational achievement by either parent (none or primary/secondary/university), and the type of school (public/private).
Four models were fit: a) unadjusted for potential confounders; b) adjusted only for well variables (water arsenic and depth); c) adjusted for indicators of SES (maternal education, family land ownership, paternal occupation, TV access, and housing type); d) adjusted for all measured covariates.
To account for potential differences in treatment that may affect outcomes, we adjusted for indicators of the appropriateness of treatment, including treatment duration with an injectable drug, the number of effective drugs used during the initial empirical therapy and the individualized therapy following the availability of second-line DST results.
Also, despite adjusting for proxy indicators, e.g., wealth, exposure to infection might still have differed between the study groups, considering the patchy malaria transmission in Kumasi (6 ).
We were also able to adjust the analysis for three indicators of socioeconomic status including paternal income, thus reducing the risk of substantial confounding, though no obvious relation between socioeconomic status and leukemia risk appears to exist [ 15], and in the present study risk estimates did not substantially change after adjusting for these indicators.
